Major US vacation destination could get more expensive as officials eye new fees

Visitors to Lake Tahoe (pictured) could face new or higher fees at several recreation sites under a proposal being considered by the U.S.Forest Service.(iStock)

The fee at Eagle Falls Picnic Area and Trailhead would increase from $5 per vehicle to $10 before eventually reaching $15.

Campers could also see new costs. 

Luther Pass Overflow Campgroundand Watson Lake Campground, which are currently free, would each begin charging $20 per site.

Money collected would go toward operating, maintaining and improving recreation sites.

Read More → Your home is empty.Do burglars already know?

More than 37% of recreation sites would remain free if the changes are approved — while nationally recognized fee-free days would continue, according to the release.

Money collected from the fees would go toward operating, maintaining and improving recreation sites.

Under federal law, the Forest Service can keep at least 80% of the fees collected at the sites for local use.

Read More → American tourist stranded after volcano eruption sparks mass flight cancellations

“Revenue collected through recreation fees would help the forest improve infrastructure and public services at recreation sites during the season of operation,” the USDA said in the release.

Kiva Beach, shown above, would begin charging $10 per vehicle, with fees eventually rising to $15 under the proposal.(iStock)

The public can comment on details of the proposal through Sept.29.

After the comment period ends, a citizens advisory committee will review the proposal and make a recommendation to the regional forester, who will make the final decision, according to the press release.

Read More → Republicans fail to ease one of Trump’s greatest fears as Supreme Court measure collapses

The proposal has drawn pushback online, with some people raising concerns about having topay for placesthey regularly visit.

“Sign me up for the riot if they make Kiva pay to park,” one Reddit user wrote.

If approved, the changes would still leave more than 37% of recreation sites free to visit, while nationally recognized fee-free days would remain in place.(iStock)

Another commenter suggested giving local residents a free seasonal parking pass.

“I have no problem paying to recreate in other areas I visit,” the user wrote.“But my city of residence?Give me back my tax money, then.”

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Read More → Trump wants to help 146,000 mentally ill who are homeless.Democrats want to stop him

Another commenter similarly argued that “season passes and fees should only be for non-locals,” adding, “I’m happy to pay when Ivisit other towns.”

Not everyone opposed charging fees altogether. 

One commenter said that doing so during the busy summer months could make sense, but questioned charging visitors year-round.

onelink.me/xLDS?pid=AppArticleLink&af_web_dp=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.

“I can see doing it in the summer because of the amount of visitors,” the user wrote.“But doing it year-round feels excessive.”

S.Forest Service for comment.